🇺🇸 Construction can begin for Willow oil project, federal judge says
By James Brooks, Alaska Beacon
ANCHORAGE — A FEDERAL court judge on Monday ruled against environmental groups seeking to block preliminary construction of the Willow oil project on Alaska’s North Slope.
The decision allows ConocoPhillips, the project’s developer, to begin digging a gravel mine and building a gravel road to access the area projected to be the largest new North Slope oil development in decades. A boat ramp to support subsistence hunting and fishing is also planned.
Legal challenges will continue, multiple environmental groups said.
The Alaska Legislature voted unanimously to support ConocoPhillips’ position in the lawsuit, and the oil firm also received support from industry groups, the AFL-CIO and Alaska’s congressional delegation.
ConocoPhillips said in court filings that it has already constructed ice roads and could begin gravel work as soon as Tuesday.
“With this decision from the federal district court, we are able to immediately begin construction activities,” said Rebecca Boys, director of media and advertising for ConocoPhillips Alaska, by email.
Environmental groups, which have been seeking to stop the development, said they were unhappy with the ruling from Alaska District Court Judge Sharon Gleason.
“This is a profoundly disappointing decision,” said Karlin Itchoak, The Wilderness Society’s senior regional director for Alaska. “Willow poses a serious threat to air quality and subsistence resources for Indigenous communities in the region — as well as the world’s climate — and ConocoPhillips should not be allowed to begin work on a destructive project that was poorly evaluated by the Bureau of Land Management. We will continue to fight with all means at our disposal.”
Most heavy construction on the North Slope takes place in winter, when the tundra can be navigated by ice roads, and ConocoPhillips said it expects to work only from April 4 to about April 25, depending on weather.
In a 44-page order, Gleason wrote that environmental groups failed to demonstrate that those three weeks of work would cause irreparable harm to the environment.
She wrote that the court has received “numerous declarations” discussing the environmental harm that could be caused if oil is produced from Willow, “but regardless of the validity of these concerns, they are not relevant to the Court’s consideration of the current motions because the planned Winter 2023 Construction Activities do not include the extraction of any oil and gas.”
She said blasting at the proposed gravel quarry was unlikely to harm residents of Nuiqsut, the closest town to the site, and that subsistence hunters were unlikely to be harmed by construction this winter.
When considering whether construction is in the public interest, Gleason said she gave “considerable weight” to the Alaska Legislature’s unanimous vote in support of the project.
Boys said support for fighting the lawsuit was significant.
“We appreciate the support from the intervening parties and others who recognize that Willow will provide meaningful opportunities for Alaska Native communities and the State of Alaska, and domestic energy for America,” Boys said by email.
FURTHER READING
• 🇺🇸 Arctic drilling likely a money-loser for Alaska in early years
• Analysis: Legal challenges could delay Alaska’s Willow oil project
• Biden administration approves massive Willow oil project in Alaska
• Biden issues limits on oil drilling in Alaska, Arctic Ocean
• Voice the Arctic Iñupiat on latest Willow Project reports
• A willow the greens can do without
• Alaska’s DC reps lobby Biden to approve Willow oil and gas project
• As a new review gets underway, the future of a huge Arctic Alaska oil project is uncertain
• Biden administration backs smaller version of ConocoPhillips project
• A US federal judge throws out the approval of a major new oil project in Alaska’s Arctic
• Appeals court halts construction at ConocoPhillips’ Willow project in Alaska’s Arctic
Alaska Beacon is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Alaska Beacon maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Andrew Kitchenman for questions: [email protected]. Follow Alaska Beacon on Facebook and Twitter.
This article has been fact-checked by Arctic Business Journal and Polar Research and Policy Initiative, with the support of the EMIF managed by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for any content supported by the European Media and Information Fund lies with the author(s) and it may not necessarily reflect the positions of the EMIF and the Fund Partners, the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation and the European University Institute.
