Turkey says Sweden, Finland must still do more to secure NATO membership

Turkey has accused the two Nordic countries of harboring militants from the banned Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and other groups.

175
Banners displaying the NATO logo are placed at the entrance of new NATO headquarters during the move to the new building, in Brussels, Belgium on April 19, 2018. (Yves Herman / Reuters File Photo)

ANKARA — Turkey said on Wednesday that Sweden and Finland had made progress towards NATO membership but that they still needed to do more to satisfy Ankara’s requests on tackling terrorism.

Sweden and Finland applied in May to join NATO in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but ran into objections from Turkey, which accused the two Nordic countries of harboring militants from the banned Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and other groups.

Stockholm and Helsinki deny harboring militants but have pledged to cooperate with Ankara to fully address its security concerns and also to lift arms embargoes.

“The two countries took some steps, we recognize them. But there have not been any steps on extradition requests and freezing terror assets,” Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu told reporters at a NATO gathering in Bucharest.

But Cavusoglu also praised Sweden’s new government for what he called a “a more decisive, tougher stance on terrorism.”

Speaking earlier on Wednesday from the Bucharest gathering, Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billstrom said his country and Finland had made good progress towards an agreement with Turkey.

“We had a very good bilateral yesterday between Sweden, Finland and Turkey, and I felt after this meeting that there is progress. We are moving forward,” he told reporters on arriving for the second day of the NATO foreign ministers’ meeting.

Hungary, the only other member of the 30-nation NATO alliance yet to ratify the two Nordic countries’ application, has promised to approve the bids in early February 2023, Finnish Foreign Minister Pekka Haasvisto said on Wednesday.

Reporting by Ece Toksabay and Huseyin Hayatsever.


This article has been fact-checked by Arctic Today and Polar Research and Policy Initiative, with the support of the EMIF managed by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for any content supported by the European Media and Information Fund lies with the author(s) and it may not necessarily reflect the positions of the EMIF and the Fund Partners, the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation and the European University Institute.