Barclays says it will no longer make controversial energy investments, including in Arctic oil

The bank’s decision follows a previous warning to investors of the economic and public perception risks associated with certain types of energy investments.

1516
A Barclays bank building is seen at Canary Wharf in London, Britain, October 19, 2016. (Hannah McKay / Reuters File Photo)

Self-imposed restrictions on investment in fossil fuels will likely see Barclays, a U.K.-based bank, refuse to finance new oil and gas drilling in the Arctic, including in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

The policy, released Monday, will also apply to coal mining, oil-sands extraction and projects that affect indigenous groups. It follows on a policy announcement in May that directs the bank to avoid doing business with clients involved in projects in or near UN World Heritage sites.

Barclays expects that the new guidelines will keep it out of “sensitive energy sectors” entirely.

“Banks have an important role to play in ensuring that the world’s energy needs are met while helping to limit the threat that climate change poses to people and to the natural environment,” the policy states.

[Trump administration working on Arctic oil leases despite shutdown]

But the bank also said that — while it will use the new policy to shift investment into cleaner forms of energy — it will continue to invest in fossil-fuel projects that “operate in an environmentally and socially responsible way, in order to meet the world’s energy needs.”

And Barclays left the door open to investing in the projects singled out in the guidelines — as long as they must pass a tougher vetting process it calls Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD).

But the likelihood of a project being approved is low, according to the bank.

“Any client conducting new exploration of or extraction of Arctic oil and gas will be subject to EDD,” the policy stated. “Additionally, Barclays will conduct EDD on any financing transaction directly connected with the exploration or extraction of oil or gas in the Arctic Under the EDD framework, we would not expect such project finance proposals to meet our criteria.”

In 2015, Barclays, one of the world’s 50 largest banks by revenue, warned investors and lenders that large-scale oil and gas operations involve a number of risks that could be detrimental to their public image and could affect their ability to raise money. Those guidelines singled out the potential for Arctic drilling to damage coastal and marine environments as a major concern.

[As Norway’s North Sea fields wind down, the replacement remains a day away]

Yesterday’s announcement makes Barclays the 12th major bank to limit funding for Arctic oil and gas exploration in some manner, according to Banktrack, a lobby group pushing for banks to become more socially responsible.

Under the new policy, Barclays says it would be unlikely to provide funding for oil and gas exploration in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, an area it described as a “particularly fragile and pristine ecosystem which is central to the livelihoods and culture of local indigenous peoples.”

Environmental groups criticised the policy for not going far enough to restrict financing for activities such as tar-sands exploitation. But, the voluntary limitation on Arctic drilling, according to the Sierra Club, an American environmental group, was a sign that banks now considered such activities a “bad bet.”