Climate change sharpens fight over Alaska mining road

By Elías Thorsson December 12, 2025
114
President Donald Trump, flanked by Secretary of Energy Chris Wright and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, signs an Executive Order approving the Ambler Road Project in Alaska, Monday, October 6, 2025, in the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian)

AP reports that renewed federal support for Alaska’s long-debated Ambler Access Road is reopening deep divisions in northwest Alaska, where Indigenous communities, environmental advocates and supporters of mining development are weighing economic hopes against ecological and cultural risks.

  • The Ambler Access Road is a proposed 211-mile industrial road intended to link the Dalton Highway to the Ambler Mining District, an area believed to hold significant deposits of copper, zinc and other minerals considered strategically important.

  • The route would cross remote wilderness, including lands near Gates of the Arctic National Park, and pass over hundreds of rivers and streams in a region already heavily affected by climate change.

  • Indigenous Inupiaq communities are divided. Some residents see the road as a potential lifeline for jobs, lower living costs and economic survival in villages with limited employment opportunities.

  • Others fear the project would damage fragile ecosystems, disrupt caribou migrations and salmon runs and undermine subsistence hunting and fishing that remain central to cultural identity and food security.

  • AP reports that climate change is already reshaping the region, with warming occurring several times faster than the global average, caribou populations declining sharply and changing freeze-thaw cycles affecting fish habitat.

  • The project was previously blocked following environmental reviews but has gained renewed momentum after federal approvals were reinstated, prompting fresh legal challenges from tribes and environmental groups.

  • Supporters argue the road is necessary to access domestic mineral supplies and reduce reliance on foreign sources, while critics warn the long-term environmental and cultural costs could be irreversible.